You are currently viewing Can We Nudge People to Recycle?

Can We Nudge People to Recycle?

Our ‘Living Lab in Looe’ project aims to better understand why plastic is ending up in the Looe River and whether psychologically-smart signs can ‘nudge’ visitors’ behaviour towards better behaviour along the harbour quayside in Looe, Cornwall – turning them away from throwing plastic in the river towards recycling their waste.

The whole idea for the project was inspired by research by J. Cinner in 2018 (1) that found that conservation campaigns often have little effect because they don’t understand what actually drives human behaviour – they focus on changing attitudes through education, but often fail to actually change peoples behaviour. For example its much easier to use an education campaign to get people to think recycling is good, than to actually get them to recycle. Other psychological factors are at play.

To test out new different psychological methods against old methods we created simplified versions of common anti-litter signs and some new signs informed in their design by the modern scientific understanding of our human minds. The visual ‘nudges’ utilised in this study are a series of 7 different types of signs designed to encourage visitors to dispose of their plastic responsibility. All the signs feature a informational/educational message “Litter harms our community and marine life” at the bottom. They were designed in accordance with previous research – which argues plain-English wording with clear iconographic images is most effective (2,3,4).

Three of the signs copied the most common strategies of contemporary conservation signs reminding individuals of fines for littering, that the site is part of a conservation area and that Looe is a strong community (See above). The remaining four signs were designed in accordance with our modern understanding of our minds, utilising the effect of various psychological effects. One used observation bias in the form of a watching eye with the wording “You are being watched”. Another used a prescriptive norm in the form of “Be a hero – Recycle” and a icon modelling the desired behaviour. Finally the last two used a positive and negative version of the same descriptive norm “9 out of 10 people use a bin” and “1 out of 10 litter” with icons indicating this.

Above you can see the study squares (right) and where the signs were fixed onto the harbour piles (left). The study are and signs were only made possible thanks to our collaborators from the Looe Harbour Commissioners, the Looe Marine Conservation Group and Looe Gifts.

WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?

Psychological Signs Reduced Plastic Litter – Our experiment results showed a significant reduction in the accumulation of plastic in sites with the observing eye, the prescriptive “Be a Hero – Recycle” norm, positive descriptive “9 out of 10 use a bin” norm, and the conservation salience nudge signs. 

Traditional Signs with Fines and Community Messages had no effect – There was no significant difference between the control sites and sites with signs featuring reminders of community or financial penalties for littering.

Signs Stating that “Some People Litter” actually created more waste! -Signs featuring the negative descriptive norm of “1 out of 10 people litter” actually significantly increased the accumulation of plastic. 

Overall our experiment suggests that behavioural ‘nudge’ signs and targeted salience signs can be powerful tools for encouraging pro-environmental behaviour.

What do Results mean for Future Conservation Campaigns?

Traditional approaches need to change: Traditional fine signs and those leveraging community identity may not be effective in tackling marine plastic. We may need to give up on the idea that messages scaring people with fines or using vague calls to community or national pride actually make any difference on actual behaviour.

Psychological nudging is powerful, in the moment at least: Social influence and targeted salience signs can be powerful tools for encouraging a reduction in plastic waste, though likely have no effect long term. Also this strength comes with a cautionary tale – care must be taken to avoid increasing the salience and perceived social acceptability of negative behaviours. 

Signs work: Well-designed sign interventions therefore can form part of an effective long-term prevention of marine debris, representing easy-wins in the battle against litter and marine plastic debris for local groups and authorities.

The hope is that we can find more effective solutions to the environmental challenges Cornwall and the rest of the world faces. The insights gained will also help any community, business or organisation experiencing environmental problems due to the behaviour of visitors, who are often not invested in the long-term health of the environmental places they visit, helping coastal communities to make signage that is targeted and effective reducing the tide of plastic entering our oceans.

Further Information and References

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-3.png
Here is the juicy quantitive details for the Box plots above.

(1) Cinner, J. (2018). How behavioural science can help conservation. Science, 362(6417), pp. 889-890

(2) Byerly, H., Balmford, A., Ferraro, P.J., Hammond Wagner, C., Palchak, E., Polasky, S., Ricketts, T.H., Schwartz, A.J. and Fisher, B., 2018. Nudging pro‐environmental behavior: evidence and opportunities. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 16(3), pp.159- 168.

(3) Beretti, A., Figuières, C. and Grolleau, G., 2013. Behavioral innovations: The missing capital in sustainable development?. Ecological Economics, 89, pp.187-195.

(4) Shotton, R., 2018. The Choice Factory: 25 behavioural biases that influence what we buy. Harriman House Limited.

Further Reading

Ajzen, I., 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), pp.179-211.

Ajzen, I., 2011. The theory of planned behaviour: reactions and reflections.

Albarracin, D. and Glasman, L.R., 2016. Multidimensional targeting for tailoring: A comment on Ogden (2016). Health psychology review, 10(3), pp.251-255.

Alcott, H., 2011. Social norms and energy conservation. Journal of public Economics, 95(9-10), pp.1082-1095.

Andger, W.N., Brown, K., Fairbrass, J., Jordan, A., Paavola, J. and Posendo, S. (2002). Governance for sustainability: Towards a’thick’understanding of environmental decision making (No. 02-04). CSERGE Working Paper EDM.

Ballantyne, R., Packer, J. and Sutherland, L.A., 2011. Visitors’ memories of wildlife tourism: Implications for the design of powerful interpretive experiences. Tourism management, 32(4), pp.770-779.

Balz, J., Sunstein, C. and Thaler, R., 2014. Choice architecture. E. Shafir, The behavioral foundations of public policy, pp.428-439.

Barr, S., 2006. Environmental action in the home: Investigating the’value-action’gap. Geography, pp.43-54.

Bateson, M., Nettle, D. and Roberts, G., 2006. Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology letters, 2(3), pp.412-414.

Bateson, M., Robinson, R., Abayomi-Cole, T., Greenlees, J., O’Connor, A. and Nettle, D., 2015. Watching eyes on potential litter can reduce littering: evidence from two field experiments. PeerJ, 3, p.e1443.

Blake, J. (1999). Overcoming the ‘value‐action gap’in environmental policy: Tensions between nation al policy and local experience. Local environment, 4(3), pp.257-278.

Bolderdijk, J.W., Steg, L., Geller, E.S., Lehman, P.K. and Postmes, T., 2013. Comparing the effectiveness of monetary versus moral motives in environmental campaigning. Nature Climate Change, 3(4), p.413.

Campbell, F., 2007. People who litter. Wigan, UK: ENCAMS.

Cheung, S.F., Chan, D.K.S. and Wong, Z.S.Y., 1999. Reexamining the theory of planned behavior in understanding wastepaper recycling. Environment and behavior, 31(5), pp.587-612.

Cialdini, R.B., 2003. Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current directions in psychological science, 12(4), pp.105-109.

Cialdini, R.B., Demaine, L.J., Sagarin, B.J., Barrett, D.W., Rhoads, K. and Winter, P.L., 2006. Managing social norms for persuasive impact. Social influence, 1(1), pp.3-15.

Cinner, J. (2018). How behavioural science can help conservation. Science, 362(6417), pp. 889-890

Cohen, S. (2013). Nudging and informed consent. The American Journal of Bioethics, 13(6), pp.3-11.

Convery, F., McDonnell, S. and Ferreira, S. (2007). The most popular tax in Europe? Lessons from the Irish plastic bags levy. Environmental and resource economics, 38(1), pp.1-11.

Cosic, A., Cosic, H. and Ille, S. (2018). Can nudges affect students’ green behaviour? A field experiment. Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, 2(1), pp.107-111.

Dear, K., Dutton, K. and Fox, E., 2019. Do ‘watching eyes’ influence antisocial behavior? A systematic review & meta-analysis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(3), pp.269- 280.

Derraik, J.G., 2002. The pollution of the marine environment by plastic debris: a review. Marine pollution bulletin, 44(9), pp.842-852.

Doyle, A., Chang, J., Cardinal, K., Chen, L. and Divangahi, M., 2015. Impact of eyes on waste diversion research:’every move you make, I’ll be watching you’.

Frederiks, E.R., Stenner, K. and Hobman, E.V., 2015. Household energy use: Applying behavioural economics to understand consumer decision-making and behaviour. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, pp.1385-1394.

Geyer, R., Jambeck, J.R. and Law, K.L. (2017). Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Science advances, 3(7), p.e1700782.

Gifford, R. ed., 2016. Research methods for environmental psychology. John Wiley & Sons.

Goldstein NJ, Cialdini RB, and Griskevicius V. 2008. A room with a viewpoint: using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. J Consum Res 35: 472– 82

Goldstein, D.G. and Gigerenzer, G., 2009. Fast and frugal forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting, 25(4), pp.760-772.

Goldstein, D.G. and Gigerenzer, G., 2011. The beauty of simple models: Themes in recognition heuristic research. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(5), pp.392-395.

Goldstein, N.J. and Cialdini, R.B., 2007. Using social norms as a lever of social influence. The science of social influence: Advances and future progress, pp.167-192.

Griggs, D., Stafford-Smith, M., Gaffney, O., Rockström, J., Öhman, M.C., Shyamsundar, P., Steffen, W., Glaser, G., Kanie, N. and Noble, I., 2013. Policy: Sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature, 495(7441), p.305.

Halden, R.U., 2010. Plastics and health risks. Annual review of public health, 31, pp.179-194.

Hamann, K.R., Reese, G., Seewald, D. and Loeschinger, D.C., 2015. Affixing the theory of normative conduct (to your mailbox): Prescriptive and descriptive norms as predictors of anti-ads sticker use. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, pp.1-9.

Head, B.W. (2008). Wicked problems in public policy. Public policy, 3(2), p.101.

Head, B.W. and Alford, J. (2015). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration & society, 47(6), pp.711-739.

House of Lords (Science and Technology Select Committee). (2011). Behaviour Change Report. Stationery Office. Available: publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201012/ldselect/ldsctech/179/179.pdf. [Accessed 7 Apr. 2016].

Jae, H., Delvecchio, D., & Cowles, D. (2008). Picture-Text Incongruency in Print Advertisements among Low- and High-Literacy Consumers. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 42(3), pp.439-451.

Kallbekken, S. and Sælen, H., 2013. ‘Nudging’hotel guests to reduce food waste as a win–win environmental measure. Economics Letters, 119(3), pp.325-327.

Karp, D.G., 1996. Values and their effect on pro-environmental behavior. Environment and behavior, 28(1), pp.111-133.

Kosters, M. and Van der Heijden, J., 2015. From mechanism to virtue: Evaluating Nudge theory. Evaluation, 21(3), pp.276-291.

Lebreton, L.C., Van der Zwet, J., Damsteeg, J.W., Slat, B., Andrady, A. and Reisser, J., 2017. River plastic emissions to the world’s oceans. Nature communications, 8, p.15611.

Lehner, M., Mont, O. and Heiskanen, E., 2016. Nudging–A promising tool for sustainable consumption behaviour?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 134, pp.166-177.

Loibl, C., Sunstein, C.R., Rauber, J. and Reisch, L.A., 2018. Which Europeans like nudges? Approval and controversy in four European countries. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 52(3), pp.655-688.

Maichum, K., Parichatnon, S. and Peng, K.C., 2016. Application of the extended theory of planned behavior model to investigate purchase intention of green products among Thai consumers. Sustainability, 8(10), p.1077.

Manesi, Z., Van Lange, P.A. and Pollet, T.V., 2016. Eyes wide open: Only eyes that pay attention promote prosocial behavior. Evolutionary Psychology, 14(2), p.1474704916640780.

McCoy, K., Oliver, J.J., Borden, D.S. and Cohn, S.I., 2018. Nudging waste diversion at Western State Colorado University: application of behavioral insights. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19(3), pp.608-621.

Michie, S., Van Stralen, M.M. and West, R., 2011. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation science, 6(1), p.42.

Milford, A.B., Øvrum, A. and Helgesen, H. (2015). Nudges to increase recycling and reduce waste.

Miller, D.T. and Prentice, D.A., 2013. Psychological levers of behavior change. The behavioral foundations of public policy, pp.301-309.

Muir, D.C., Wagemann, R., Hargrave, B.T., Thomas, D.J., Peakall, D.B. and Norstrom, R.J., 1992. Arctic marine ecosystem contamination. Science of the Total Environment, 122(1-2), pp.75-134.

Nicholson-Cole, S.A., 2005. Representing climate change futures: a critique on the use of images for visual communication. Computers, environment and urban systems, 29(3), pp.255-273.

Northover, S.B., Pedersen, W.C., Cohen, A.B. and Andrews, P.W., 2017. Artificial surveillance cues do not increase generosity: Two meta-analyses. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(1), pp.144-153.

O’Neill, S.J., Boykoff, M., Niemeyer, S. and Day, S.A., 2013. On the use of imagery for climate change engagement. Global environmental change, 23(2), pp.413-421.

Ogden, J., 2016. Celebrating variability and a call to limit systematisation: the example of the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy and the Behaviour Change Wheel. Health psychology review, 10(3), pp.245-250.

Ogunola, O.S., Onada, O.A. and Falaye, A.E., 2018. Mitigation measures to avert the impacts of plastics and microplastics in the marine environment (a review). Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(10), pp.9293-9310.

Ölander, F. and Thøgersen, J., 2014. Informing versus nudging in environmental policy. Journal of Consumer Policy, 37(3), pp.341-356.

Osbaldiston, R. & Schott, J. (2011). Environmental Sustainability and Behavioral Science: Meta-Analysis of Proenvironmental Behavior Experiments. Environment and Behavior, 44(2), pp.257-299.

Ouellette, J.A., Hessling, R., Gibbons, F.X., Reis-Bergan, M. and Gerrard, M., 2005. Using images to increase exercise behavior: Prototypes versus possible selves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(5), pp.610-620.

Pakpour, A.H., Zeidi, I.M., Emamjomeh, M.M., Asefzadeh, S. and Pearson, H., 2014. Household waste behaviours among a community sample in Iran: An application of the theory of planned behaviour. Waste management, 34(6), pp.980-986.

Paul, J., Modi, A. and Patel, J., 2016. Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action. Journal of retailing and consumer services, 29, pp.123-134.

Pe’er, E., Feldman, Y., Gamliel, E., Sahar, L., Tikotsky, A., Hod, N. and Schupak, H., 2019. Do minorities like nudges? The role of group norms in attitudes towards behavioral policy. Judgment and Decision Making, 14(1), p.40.

Pearson, E., Dorrian, J. and Litchfield, C., 2011. Harnessing visual media in environmental education: increasing knowledge of orangutan conservation issues and facilitating sustainable behaviour through video presentations. Environmental Education Research, 17(6), pp.751-767.

Purnhagen, K., van Herpen, E. and van Kleef, E., 2016. The potential use of visual packaging elements as nudges. In Nudging-Possibilities, Limitations and Applications in European Law and Economics (pp. 197-216). Springer, Cham.

Reisch, L.A. and Sunstein, C.R., 2016. Do Europeans like nudges?. Judgment and Decision making, 11(4), pp.310-325.

Rittel, H.W. and Webber, M.M., 1973. Wicked problems. Man-made Futures, 26(1), pp.272-280.

Rubens, L., Gosling, P., Bonaiuto, M., Brisbois, X. and Moch, A., 2015. Being a hypocrite or committed while I am shopping? A comparison of the impact of two interventions on environmentally friendly behavior. Environment and Behavior, 47(1), pp.3-16.

Saghai, Y., 2013. Salvaging the concept of nudge. Journal of medical ethics, 39(8), pp.487-493.

Schubert, C. (2017). Green nudges: Do they work? Are they ethical?. Ecological economics, 132, pp.329-342.

Schultz, P.W., Bator, R.J., Large, L.B., Bruni, C.M. and Tabanico, J.J., 2013. Littering in context: personal and environmental predictors of littering behavior. Environment and Behavior, 45(1), pp.35-59.

Schultz, P.W., Nolan, J.M., Cialdini, R.B., Goldstein, N.J. and Griskevicius, V., 2007. The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological science, 18(5), pp.429-434.

Schwarzer, R., 2014. Life and death of health behaviour theories. Health Psychology Review, 8(1), pp.53-56.

Shearer, L., Gatersleben, B., Morse, S., Smyth, M. and Hunt, S., 2017. A problem unstuck? Evaluating the effectiveness of sticker prompts for encouraging household food waste recycling behaviour. Waste management, 60, pp.164-172.

Sheavly, S.B. and Register, K.M., 2007. Marine debris & plastics: environmental concerns, sources, impacts and solutions. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 15(4), pp.301-305.

Shotton, R., 2018. The Choice Factory: 25 behavioural biases that influence what we buy. Harriman House Limited.

Smith, J.R., Louis, W.R., Terry, D.J., Greenaway, K.H., Clarke, M.R. and Cheng, X., 2012. Congruent or conflicted? The impact of prescriptive and descriptive norms on environmental intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), pp.353-361.

Sniehotta, F., 2009. An experimental test of the theory of planned behavior. Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being, 1(2), pp.257-270.

Steg, L. and Vlek, C., 2009. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of environmental psychology, 29(3), pp.309-317.

Steinmetz, J. and Pfattheicher, S., 2017. Beyond social facilitation: A review of the far- reaching effects of social attention. Social Cognition, 35(5), pp.585-599.

Sunstein, C.R., 2015. The ethics of nudging. Yale J. on Reg., 32, p.413. Sunstein, C.R., 2016. Do people like nudges. Admin. L. Rev., 68, p.177.

Sunstein, C.R., 2017. People like nudges (mostly). In Human Agency and Behavioral Economics (pp. 17-39). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

Sussman, R., Greeno, M., Gifford, R. & Scannell, L. (2012). The Effectiveness of Models and Prompts on Waste Diversion: A Field Experiment on Composting by Cafeteria Patrons. J Appl Soc Psychol, 43(1), pp.24-34

Thaler, R.H. and Sunstein, C.R., 2008. Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Penguin.

Verplanken, B. and Wood, W., 2006. Interventions to break and create consumer habits. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 25(1), pp.90-103.

Vince, J. and Hardesty, B.D., 2017. Plastic pollution challenges in marine and coastal environments: from local to global governance. Restoration ecology, 25(1), pp.123- 128.

Vince, J. and Stoett, P., 2018. From problem to crisis to interdisciplinary solutions: Plastic marine debris. Marine Policy, 96, pp.200-203.

White, K.M., Smith, J.R., Terry, D.J., Greenslade, J.H. and McKimmie, B.M., 2009. Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, prescriptive, and in‐group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(1), pp.135-158.

Wilkinson, T.M., 2013. Nudging and manipulation. Political Studies, 61(2), p.341-355.

Wood, W., Tam, L. and Witt, M.G., 2006. Changing circumstances, disrupting habits. Journal of personality and social psychology, 88(6), p.918.